When a Bookworm Likes the Film Version Better

Book vs. Flim

*GASP* How could I even give a blog post a title that so borders on bookish sacrilege?

Yes, I know–bookworms all over often proclaim the unfailing superiority of books over their film versions. “The book is always better than the movie.”

Granted, when it comes to books that are later made into films, I often prefer what I read over what I watch. However, as an enthusiast who has, in recent years, been growing to love films about as much as I love books (due to my love of storytelling in general, whether literary or visual), it’s been getting easier for me to view books and films as separate works, which indeed they are.

Books and films are different works of art that have different creative requirements, and oftentimes, varied audiences. Even when a film is based on a book, a filmmaker is creating a whole new, separate work from the original author’s. While one filmmaker who’s obtained a book’s film rights may wish to make the “movie version” of that book, another filmmaker who’s obtained the film rights of a book may not be out to just make the book into a movie but to make a movie based on, but not necessarily limited by, the book’s original idea(s). Both are legitimate filmmaking approaches.

Keeping “separate works” in mind helps me not to downgrade a film merely because it’s different from the book it’s based on. That way I can judge the film for what it is: a film.

A Walk to RememberWith that said, yes, there are rare occasions when this lifelong bookworm enjoys a film more than the book it’s based on. A Walk to Remember by Nicholas Sparks was a nice read to me overall, but it didn’t have a profound, lasting impact on me like the 2002 Warner Bros. film did and does. Shane West and Mandy Moore really add compelling flesh and blood to the Landon and Jamie characters, and I usually have a tear or two during a few scenes in the movie, including the Spring Play when Jamie sings “Only Hope.” (If you happen not to have a tear when you watch the scene–of course, the rest of the movie is what gives this part more meaning.)

My Sister's Keeper

As I read My Sister’s Keeper by Jodi Picoult, I got a pretty immediate sense of why she’s such a popular author, and the book had me all in–right up until the end, which gave me an unpleasant “Wait a minute–huh? That’s it?” jolt, even for a reader who loves to read the unexpected. Apparently, some readers even see the ending as a cop-out from the tough questions the novel raises. I wouldn’t give it that label, but the ending is one reason I enjoyed the 2009 New Line Cinema film more than the book. Some may still see the film’s reworked ending as something of a cop-out or a tidy smooth-over for untidy life circumstances, but the film’s plot has more of a natural flow to me, particularly where the ending is concerned.

So. Are you a bookworm who’s ever liked a film better than the book it’s based on? If so, feel free to ‘fess up!


15 thoughts on “When a Bookworm Likes the Film Version Better

  1. Gayle Mullen Pace says:

    Great thought provoking post! I can only think of two books: The Bridges of Madison County and The Thorn Birds. It isn’t that I loved the film versions better, but that the film version’s stories were fleshed out and more complete and satisfying in the telling. At least for me, anyway.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Nadine C. Keels says:

      Ah! The scandal of it all, for one to give up on the books altogether as one continues on with the film(s). 😉 There are some movies I’ve watched knowing that I will never (as far as my plans currently go) read the books they are based on. The Other Boleyn Girl is one of them…


    • Brita says:

      The movie version of The Other Boleyn Girl is great, but SO different than the book. Phillipa Gregory is my all-time favorite author. I highly recommend picking up any of her Tudor-era novels.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Nadine C. Keels says:

      Yes, I watched a featurette (or was it the film commentary?) that said the book is quite different from the film. Hearing from an avid Gregory fan makes me think twice about reading the book. 🙂


  2. literalsatisfaction says:

    So true to say that they are separate creative works! I love both books and films, it’s just they are translated and expressed differently through different media’s. Sometimes a film is just a bad film with no relation to the book and vice-versa. Great blog post! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Marja McGraw says:

    I’ve seen movies I liked more than the book. And sometimes the book and the movie are pretty close. To Kill a Mockingbird and Fried Green Tomatoes were excellent movies and for the most part they stuck to the book. In the end, though, I generally enjoy the book more than the movie, with a few exceptions. Good post!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Nadine C. Keels says:

      Yes, Marja! The book and film versions of To Kill a Mockingbird were basically a draw on my enjoyment scale, as are The Chronicles of Narnia books and the three corresponding Walden Media films as well as the novel Little Women and its 1994 film version with Winona Ryder as Jo. I think the Narnia and Little Women films wonderfully capture the spirit of the books they’re based on, even where the writing differs.


Share Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.